26
фев
Ftx Global Vector V11
Posted:adminHelp me decide:-) I am installing FSX:SE and the DX10 Fixer primarilly to run the FSLabs Airbus A32x. I will probably also install AS16, and any DXT5 cloud textures ( ASCA or REX SoftClouds, haven't decided yet ). My question is - should I go ahead and also install ORBX FTX Global ( my only scenery add-on for FSX:SE appart from Madeira by AEROSOFT ), or do you think this will always contribute to degrade the performance, even if I always set the Autogen Density at full left ( none ) or just one tick to the right?
This time i will be showing you guys how to download FTX Global vector Fully working Make Sure to Leave a like and subscribe for more videos. The recommended way to download the Orbx Libraries is via FTX Central. If your Orbx Libraries are out of date, you will see a blue notification at the bottom left of FTX Central's interface. Simply click on this to begin the update process. Alternatively, you may download our Orbx Libraries manually from this page.
But but it is not convenient. 
Change file access permissions on the Support folders did not affect.
Also, should I install FSUIPC, or isn't it really required, since I do not plan to use the tyler axis? Thx in advance for any advice. P.S.: I will not invest in P3D before it goes 64 bit, so, that is never na alternative for me. FTX Global is generally a set of replacement ground textures, so it does not reduce performance. I even read reports it makes it a bit better compared to default due to some texture optimisation techniques (though don't quote me on that). As Bob wrote this is the terrain addons which kill your performance, like the mentioned Orbx Vector or Flight1 Ultimate Terrain. You may choose not to install them or to use them with limited features activated.
For instance I use UTX Europe and some time ago I switched it off gaining around 300-500 MB free VAS. But I started missing realistic landscapes, especially when flying over regions I know well. So I decided to turn on water features (there's nothing worse than squarish coastlines, broken rivers and missing lakes) and only main highways and leave minor roads, tunnels and bridges off, which I found to be a good comprimise.
I am using the A320-X in FSX:SE with only these addons:- • FreeMesh X Europe (Amazing, and FREE!) • FTX Global • FTX Open LC Europe (I only fly in Europe) • OpusFSX (Weather and Cameras/shake effects) • REX Texture 4 Direct • A selection of well optimized, low VAS addon airports •. (I saved it til last) FTX Vector** (but see below!!) ** I have installed FTX Vector purely for the coastline / inland water body vector data, as I hate the jagged coastlines in default FSX. What I do is, deactivate ALL options (all roads, traffic, golf courses, etc, etc, everything, in the Vector Config tool. Doing this gives you just the coastline vector data, with no perceptible loss in performance. (Very similar to 's approach with UTX). I only have the FSL A320-X installed with 1024 textures, and I'm using relatively low settings in FSX:SE (no AI, autogen sparse, etc) apart from weather, which is set quite high for distance and cloud level. Sorry to rub it in for those with performance problems, but with this set up in the A320-X at Aerosoft Oslo V2 I get 45+ FPS on the ground in the A320-X's VC, and 60 in the air (I'm locked at 60).
The lowest FPS I have seen in the A320-X VC was at UK2000 Gatwick - and that was 36 FPS. My priority in this aircraft is fluidity and high flight dyamics resolution. To my eyes it all still looks amazing (aircraft and scenery!). High resolution (even 2048) just doesn't appeal to me, I'm happy with 1024, good AA/AF settings, and smooth fluid operation. I'm using a i7-4790 3.8Ghz, GTX 770 4GB, 16GB RAM, on Windows 10 64 bit. I use TrackIR so always use vsync and use Nvidia Inspector to get optimum results.
Resolution is 1920x1080. Hi dro, happy 2017. Do you have directX 10 preview on? Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk Hi Drrick, Happy New Year No, I am using DX9. The only reason for this is that I had a custom built PC made, which is fantastic, but the downside is that it came with a version of Windows 10 64bit, that doesn't include Windows Aero. When using DX10, without a Windows Aero theme, vsync is not possible and as I use TrackIR, vsync is a must for me. If it weren't for that, I would use DX10, as it runs great on my system, but alas, I need that vsync, and DX9 can utilize it without the use of a Windows Aero theme.
Popular Posts
But but it is not convenient. Change file access permissions on the Support folders did not affect.
Also, should I install FSUIPC, or isn't it really required, since I do not plan to use the tyler axis? Thx in advance for any advice. P.S.: I will not invest in P3D before it goes 64 bit, so, that is never na alternative for me. FTX Global is generally a set of replacement ground textures, so it does not reduce performance. I even read reports it makes it a bit better compared to default due to some texture optimisation techniques (though don't quote me on that). As Bob wrote this is the terrain addons which kill your performance, like the mentioned Orbx Vector or Flight1 Ultimate Terrain. You may choose not to install them or to use them with limited features activated.
For instance I use UTX Europe and some time ago I switched it off gaining around 300-500 MB free VAS. But I started missing realistic landscapes, especially when flying over regions I know well. So I decided to turn on water features (there's nothing worse than squarish coastlines, broken rivers and missing lakes) and only main highways and leave minor roads, tunnels and bridges off, which I found to be a good comprimise.
I am using the A320-X in FSX:SE with only these addons:- • FreeMesh X Europe (Amazing, and FREE!) • FTX Global • FTX Open LC Europe (I only fly in Europe) • OpusFSX (Weather and Cameras/shake effects) • REX Texture 4 Direct • A selection of well optimized, low VAS addon airports •. (I saved it til last) FTX Vector** (but see below!!) ** I have installed FTX Vector purely for the coastline / inland water body vector data, as I hate the jagged coastlines in default FSX. What I do is, deactivate ALL options (all roads, traffic, golf courses, etc, etc, everything, in the Vector Config tool. Doing this gives you just the coastline vector data, with no perceptible loss in performance. (Very similar to 's approach with UTX). I only have the FSL A320-X installed with 1024 textures, and I'm using relatively low settings in FSX:SE (no AI, autogen sparse, etc) apart from weather, which is set quite high for distance and cloud level. Sorry to rub it in for those with performance problems, but with this set up in the A320-X at Aerosoft Oslo V2 I get 45+ FPS on the ground in the A320-X's VC, and 60 in the air (I'm locked at 60).
The lowest FPS I have seen in the A320-X VC was at UK2000 Gatwick - and that was 36 FPS. My priority in this aircraft is fluidity and high flight dyamics resolution. To my eyes it all still looks amazing (aircraft and scenery!). High resolution (even 2048) just doesn't appeal to me, I'm happy with 1024, good AA/AF settings, and smooth fluid operation. I'm using a i7-4790 3.8Ghz, GTX 770 4GB, 16GB RAM, on Windows 10 64 bit. I use TrackIR so always use vsync and use Nvidia Inspector to get optimum results.
Resolution is 1920x1080. Hi dro, happy 2017. Do you have directX 10 preview on? Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk Hi Drrick, Happy New Year No, I am using DX9. The only reason for this is that I had a custom built PC made, which is fantastic, but the downside is that it came with a version of Windows 10 64bit, that doesn't include Windows Aero. When using DX10, without a Windows Aero theme, vsync is not possible and as I use TrackIR, vsync is a must for me. If it weren't for that, I would use DX10, as it runs great on my system, but alas, I need that vsync, and DX9 can utilize it without the use of a Windows Aero theme.
...">Ftx Global Vector V11(26.02.2019)But but it is not convenient. Change file access permissions on the Support folders did not affect.
Also, should I install FSUIPC, or isn't it really required, since I do not plan to use the tyler axis? Thx in advance for any advice. P.S.: I will not invest in P3D before it goes 64 bit, so, that is never na alternative for me. FTX Global is generally a set of replacement ground textures, so it does not reduce performance. I even read reports it makes it a bit better compared to default due to some texture optimisation techniques (though don't quote me on that). As Bob wrote this is the terrain addons which kill your performance, like the mentioned Orbx Vector or Flight1 Ultimate Terrain. You may choose not to install them or to use them with limited features activated.
For instance I use UTX Europe and some time ago I switched it off gaining around 300-500 MB free VAS. But I started missing realistic landscapes, especially when flying over regions I know well. So I decided to turn on water features (there's nothing worse than squarish coastlines, broken rivers and missing lakes) and only main highways and leave minor roads, tunnels and bridges off, which I found to be a good comprimise.
I am using the A320-X in FSX:SE with only these addons:- • FreeMesh X Europe (Amazing, and FREE!) • FTX Global • FTX Open LC Europe (I only fly in Europe) • OpusFSX (Weather and Cameras/shake effects) • REX Texture 4 Direct • A selection of well optimized, low VAS addon airports •. (I saved it til last) FTX Vector** (but see below!!) ** I have installed FTX Vector purely for the coastline / inland water body vector data, as I hate the jagged coastlines in default FSX. What I do is, deactivate ALL options (all roads, traffic, golf courses, etc, etc, everything, in the Vector Config tool. Doing this gives you just the coastline vector data, with no perceptible loss in performance. (Very similar to 's approach with UTX). I only have the FSL A320-X installed with 1024 textures, and I'm using relatively low settings in FSX:SE (no AI, autogen sparse, etc) apart from weather, which is set quite high for distance and cloud level. Sorry to rub it in for those with performance problems, but with this set up in the A320-X at Aerosoft Oslo V2 I get 45+ FPS on the ground in the A320-X's VC, and 60 in the air (I'm locked at 60).
The lowest FPS I have seen in the A320-X VC was at UK2000 Gatwick - and that was 36 FPS. My priority in this aircraft is fluidity and high flight dyamics resolution. To my eyes it all still looks amazing (aircraft and scenery!). High resolution (even 2048) just doesn't appeal to me, I'm happy with 1024, good AA/AF settings, and smooth fluid operation. I'm using a i7-4790 3.8Ghz, GTX 770 4GB, 16GB RAM, on Windows 10 64 bit. I use TrackIR so always use vsync and use Nvidia Inspector to get optimum results.
Resolution is 1920x1080. Hi dro, happy 2017. Do you have directX 10 preview on? Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk Hi Drrick, Happy New Year No, I am using DX9. The only reason for this is that I had a custom built PC made, which is fantastic, but the downside is that it came with a version of Windows 10 64bit, that doesn't include Windows Aero. When using DX10, without a Windows Aero theme, vsync is not possible and as I use TrackIR, vsync is a must for me. If it weren't for that, I would use DX10, as it runs great on my system, but alas, I need that vsync, and DX9 can utilize it without the use of a Windows Aero theme.
...">Ftx Global Vector V11(26.02.2019)